What on earth do I mean by that? This is going to be another of those rambling posts I'm afraid. Hope you can bear with me.
I have, over the years, come to believe that when you tackle an author for the first time it is of the utmost importance to make sure you choose the right book. Approach a novelist from the wrong angle and it can scar you for life. Catch them on a bad day and you may never want to read them again.
Allow me to offer some examples.
Ten years ago I had never read anything by Ian McEwan. I was aware that he was viewed as one of our finest novelists, and I had seen half an hour of The Cement Garden on the telly, but I had never actually read one of his books. I thought it was high time I did. Fortunately for me he went and won the Booker Prize and it seemed obvious that Amsterdam was the place to start. How wrong I was.
If I had a Top 10 of the most disappointing books I have ever read then Amsterdam would most certainly be on it (probably mid-table, an Aston Villa of a novel). It had won the Booker Prize for goodness sake. A panel of the literary great and the good had selected it as the finest novel of the year. What better recommendation could I have?
By making Amsterdam my introduction to Ian McEwan it put me right off him. I had no desire to read any more of his books, but people kept telling me that I should give him another go. Enduring Love was the one they all suggested but it took me six years to build up the energy to bother.
And that was another mistake. I have lost count of the number of people who told me that Enduring Love had an 'amazing opening scene' or that they had been 'blown away' by the balloon sequence. It had been built up in my mind as something remarkable but when I finally sat down and read it it really wasn't quite as good as they had suggested. Don't get me wrong, it is a powerful piece of writing and a great way to start a book but my expectations were far too high. I hadn't learned from my Amsterdam experience.
The other problem was that the balloon sequence is the single best thing in the book. I found the rest to be a rather cold and damp thriller which never got beyond a pedestrian pace. I knew nothing about the story in advance apart from that bloody balloon so the nature of the plot was a surprise but that was the only interesting element of the whole reading experience for me. It went straight down the charity shop once I had finished.
So now I have had two bad experiences with McEwan and I cannot summon up the enthusiasm to try any more. I suspect this is my loss. The Cement Garden and Atonement sit furtively upon my bookshelves should I ever waver from that position, or should anyone here post a comment that convinces me.
And then there is Philip Roth. Colossus of American literature, with reviewers falling over each other to praise each book that comes along. I had yet to read any and a copy of Everyman arrived on my desk so I got stuck in on the journey home. Exceedingly dull and rather annoying. If it was a first novel no one would have noticed it. What is all the fuss about?
Again, I have a liberal selection of his other works on my shelf but about this much [makes a gesture with fingers indicating something teeny tiny] desire to bother with them.
So you see, the route you take with certain authors is very important. I am sure I would have found the work of these two revered writers impressive and stimulating if I had simply chosen a different book to start with, but by opting for the wrong ones I may never get round to trying any more.
For this reason I am always very cautious when recommending books to people, especially those by authors dear to me. When a bloke asks me which Murakami he should start with I always suggest South Of The Border, West Of The Sun. I do this because a) it is quite short, b) the subject is something most men can relate to or fantasize about, and c) it contains just enough of the classic Murakami elements to prepare you for the weirdness of his other novels.
However, if a member of the opposite sex asks me the same question I recommend Norwegian Wood. I just think girls tend to like this one more, at least to start with.
What I would never do is propose that anyone starts with his later work. I do not think the last few novels are his best and worry that people will think they are indicative of his work as a whole and I wonder if I would be such a fan if the first Murakami I read had been Kafka On The Shore as opposed to A Wild Sheep Chase. I probably don't want to know the answer.