« The Summer Of Monkey | Main | Incoming »

July 25, 2008

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341d299153ef00e553b808de8833

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference A vs. B:

Comments

Wait. Ryan Adams and Bryan Adams are two different people?

Actually, do read it if you have time. The difference in wording makes all the difference to the joke. It is not just noshing as in eating food...

Yes, read the column (it's not that long), then you can say whether or not he has a point. And he does. I'm 100% on his side.

As a journalist who has also done lots of subbing over the years I can see both sides of this - some journos aren't actually great writers, some subs are not very sensitive in their surgery/butchery. Coren obviously has a point (although I'm not sure that most of his readers will have come away thinking 'Ah, if only he'd put an 'a' in there how much better it would have been' - myself included) but loses my sympathy for the outrageous and hysterical language in which he makes his point. The sub did not slaughter his family. It just makes Coren look like a prima donna (and let's face it, while he's not a bad writer, he's no Murakami, he's not even Alan Coren. He's reviewing a restaurant here, not penning an awardwinning poem or reporting back from a front line). The B(R)yan Adams mistake is truly terrible since the sub went so far as to check with you (which most don't) and then disregard your answer.

Or is it just a joke? He seems such a nice chap on television.

The way someone expresses their unhappiness about something shouldn't be used against them. What sounds 'outrageous and hysterical' to someone may be 'restrained' to someone else.

If someone says 'Relax!' or 'You'll live' to me (which is, in effect, what you are doing, Alex), I want to bite them. Who says what one should be angry about and in what way?

I am one of those readers who *would* come away thinking the addition of an 'a' before 'nosh' would make more sense. What the 'unaware' reader thinks of a piece is irrelevant to the writer. The writer writes as best he can, and that should be respected.

I am a sub-editor and yet I am entirely on Coren's side.

Every author I have ever worked with has expressed themselves with exactly this level of outrage when faced with what they felt was ignorant copy-editing, mine or someone else's. Plus or minus the swearing but, hey, that's only language. The whole point of my job is NOT to do something that would get this reaction, but, the thankfully few times I've been on the receiving end, I've always understood the depth of the fury.

And the lost pun apart, some people have an ear for rhythm and some don't, and if you don't you shouldn't be a sub. Authors have a right to expect their mistakes to be caught, their grammar corrected and their writing to be improved if necessary, and left alone if not.

I'm with you, Lulu. I'm a sub, too, and Coren has a right to be angry. Perhaps not incensed and abusive (pace Bela), but certainly he has a cause for complaint. But perhaps, at other times, the subs have saved his arse. Some are more awake than others. And in my experience, the prima donnas who shout at you are usually the worst writers, and the least likely to thank you when you save them from themselves. So, fine, let's print Coren unedited and see what he's really made of.

Surely this is all just a strum in a tin cap and will blowover soon.

I'm with Coren, too. He's employed to write because he knows how to write.
I'm afraid a lot of subs (and thankfully there are some exceptions, but sadly not too many) simply don't understand language in the way journalists do.
Nowadays, on a lot of papers and mags, they do less fact-checking, probably couldn't even spell libel (let alone understand the law relating to it) and don't do much design or layout.
I fear their days might be numbered.
Apologies if there are any typos in this (perhaps I need a sub!)

The comments to this entry are closed.

Now Playing

New Arrivals

My Books

Quick Flicks

Kindle Sampled

Currently Reading

Books Read: 2015

Twittering

Dipping Into

Big Mouth at the Movies

  • : The Illusionist

    The Illusionist
    This one had passed me by but I am glad I caught it. (****)

  • : La Grande Illusion

    La Grande Illusion
    I did enjoy this but one of the greatest films of all time? I think not. (***)

  • : The Grand Budapest Hotel

    The Grand Budapest Hotel
    Watched this again. Still amazing. (*****)

  • : What's Eating Gilbert Grape

    What's Eating Gilbert Grape
    Watched this for the first time in ages. Still pretty good. Leo is excellent in it. His best performance? Perhaps. (****)

  • : Rare Exports: A Christmas Tale

    Rare Exports: A Christmas Tale
    Long story but I watched this weird and very dark festive movie a month after Christmas and I loved it. (****)

  • : Diva

    Diva
    Been meaning to watch this ever since I saw Betty Blue back in the 80s but only just got round to it. I feared it would be all style over substance but it actually turned out to be a pretty good crime thriller. (****)

  • : Brothers

    Brothers
    Subtle and brilliantly acted. Liked it a lot more than I expected to. (****)

  • : Whiplash

    Whiplash
    An OK movie elevated above the norm by two excellent performances. (***)

  • : Timecrimes

    Timecrimes
    Great bit of timey-wimey nonsense. Liked it a lot. (****)

  • : More Than Honey

    More Than Honey
    Interesting documentary about bees. Didn't blow me away but kept me watching. (***)

  • : Happy-Go-Lucky

    Happy-Go-Lucky
    I thought this was going to irritate me but I ended up being quite charmed by it. (****)

  • : Our Day Will Come

    Our Day Will Come
    Bonkers road movie in which Vincent Cassel goes off on one in revenge for discrimination against redheads. Or something. (**)

  • : La Strada

    La Strada
    Supposedly Fellini's first masterpiece but it was painted with too broad brushstrokes to work its charm on me. The off-putting dubbed dialogue and sound effects didn't help either. (**)

  • : Birdman

    Birdman
    Inspired, ambitious, bonkers. (****)

  • : Inglourious Basterds

    Inglourious Basterds
    Only just got round to watching this. It is ridiculous but lots of fun. Also, an amazing about of subtitled dialogue for a major American film. (****)

  • : Le Mepris

    Le Mepris
    Brigitte Bardot, Jack Palance, Michel Piccoli and Fritz Lang star in a beautifully shot but terribly pretentious movie. Palance is awful throughout. (**)

  • : Labor Day

    Labor Day
    Was this a box office flop? I think it might have been. Shame, it was very good. (****)

Statcounter