I did things the right way round this time. I read Q & A
by Vikas Swarup before going to see Slumdog Millionaire.
I rather wish I hadn't.
Which is a strange reaction as I enjoyed both book and film. It was reading/seeing them so close together that caused me a problem.
I had heard great things about Slumdog, so when my parents announced they were coming to take the kids off our hands for the day we decided to go to the local multidigicineplex to see it. MOTC and I were unanimous in that.
I finished Q & A the night before. It was a thoroughly enjoyable read, a bit debut author clunky in places - plot development through exposition giving characters some unrealistic things to say - but a really clever story from a gifted storyteller. Something I'll take over literary prowess any day.
And because I was off to see the big screen adaptation, and in the knowledge that Danny Boyle knows a thing or two about visual style, I had great fun imagining what the director would do with certain scenes and characters. The hand-holding through the wall. The fading Bollywood actress. The battle between the priests. The Australian diplomat's house. The mysterious child spouting gobbledigook. The two excellent twists towards the end. Boyle was going to have a field day with them.
But here's the problem. None of them were in the bloody film.
I was ready. I was primed. I was in the mood to be blown away. Instead I spent the first half hour reconciling myself to the fact that the filmmakers had taken just the bare bones of the novel for their screenplay. I know, I know, this happens all the time in Hollywood, but I just wasn't expecting it with Slumdog Millionaire.
Almost everything, apart from the quiz show premise, was different. The lead character has changed name. He has a brother in the movie who is just a friend in the book (and only a bit-part at that). The quiz questions have changed. The most interesting episodes in his childhood have been omitted. And the love interest? Well, let's just say she wasn't quite as innocent in the book.
Which is not to say that Slumdog is a bad movie. It isn't. It is very good. I wouldn't call it amazing but it looked great with some excellent performances and it was £20 well spent (two tickets, a Pepsi and some nachos with cheese and extra peppers). It was fine. More than fine.
It just wasn't as good as the book.
My biggest gripe is that there are a couple of great twists in the novel which I honestly think would have made the film so much better. Leave them in and you have a classic. Leave them out and you have something that isn't.
Sorry, it must seem that I am on a downer about this but I'm not really. I was just disappointed that the best bits of the novel didn't make it into the film. I am sure if more time had gone by between my closing the book and sitting my bum down on a cinema seat I would be a bit more positive. Possibly.
Very good book. Pretty good film. Just don't mix the two.