« Artwank? | Main | Going Global »

February 04, 2009

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341d299153ef01053708b580970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Pet Book Hates #1: Mr B____ of F_____ in 18__:

Comments

I think it might be something to do with being a hangover from the old 18th century daily gossip sheets like the Tatler, which censored all names and places in order to cover the arse of its writer. A lot of newssheet writers became novelists, but why they kept this particular trait I've no idea.

I like the image on this post.

I have read that the Victorian age was highly litigeous, so it was neccessary to avoid any confusion between real people and fictional characters. See also the outrageous names which Dickens and other authors used - it wasn't just for comic effect, it warded off law suits too.

I hate the use of hyphens instead of speech marks e.g.

- Oh Vera, that's a lovely hat you have on
- That's no hat, that's my fruit bowl

And at the risk of sounding like I'm a hating kind of a person, I'm afraid I also hate the image on this post.

My pet book hate is the obsession with possessive titles that started, perhaps, with Flaubert's Parrot, but really gathered momentum after Captain Corelli's Mandolin.

It now feels as if every other historical biography has to have a possessive title:

Fermat's Last Theorem
Nathaniel's Nutmeg
Captain Bligh's Portable Nightmare
Nella's Last Peace
Kitchener's Last Volunteer
Rutka's Notebook
Darwin's Dangerous Ideaetc

and also novels like:

Lempriere's Dictionary
Hemmingway's Chair
Edward Trencom's Nose

The list goes on.

I get really irritated when any book deliberately fails to name the main character. It smacks of smart-arsery and becomes especially silly when any dialogue with or about the character becomes forced by following the pattern of not naming her. Check out Elizabeth Kostova's vastly overrated The Historian as a prime example

It's more of a production niggle - but I don't like it when very short books are printed with huge typeface to make them fill more pages. A short book is a short book, be proud of it and let it look slender on the shelf.

I've just thought of another one - introductions in classics that tell you how the novel ends. I remember dutifully reading the foreword to the Penguin Classics edition of 'Jude the Obscure' only to discover what happened to Jude. Thanks a million. Some of us still like to be surprised by the ending (although in Hardy's case, you don't need to be Mystic Meg to predict the outcome).

And I quite agree about foreign language quotes. Those of us who didn't have the benefit of a private education are not automatically proficient in several European languages and it really annoys me when some ponce starts quoting in French without including a translation.

Still, plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Currently Reading

Dipping Into

Books Read: 2015

Twittering

Kindle Sampled

Now Playing

New Arrivals

My Books

Quick Flicks

Big Mouth at the Movies

  • : Gone Girl

    Gone Girl
    Pretty good, I thought, but not amazing. I had already read the book so perhaps the lack of surprise hindered things a bit. (***)

  • : The Lunchbox

    The Lunchbox
    An absolute delight. Beautifully acted. Loved this. (****)

  • : Atomised

    Atomised
    So much better than the book. (****)

  • : 20,000 Days on Earth

    20,000 Days on Earth
    Watched this for a second time. Just as good. (****)

  • : The Illusionist

    The Illusionist
    This one had passed me by but I am glad I caught it. (****)

  • : La Grande Illusion

    La Grande Illusion
    I did enjoy this but one of the greatest films of all time? I think not. (***)

  • : The Grand Budapest Hotel

    The Grand Budapest Hotel
    Watched this again. Still amazing. (*****)

  • : What's Eating Gilbert Grape

    What's Eating Gilbert Grape
    Watched this for the first time in ages. Still pretty good. Leo is excellent in it. His best performance? Perhaps. (****)

  • : Rare Exports: A Christmas Tale

    Rare Exports: A Christmas Tale
    Long story but I watched this weird and very dark festive movie a month after Christmas and I loved it. (****)

  • : Diva

    Diva
    Been meaning to watch this ever since I saw Betty Blue back in the 80s but only just got round to it. I feared it would be all style over substance but it actually turned out to be a pretty good crime thriller. (****)

  • : Brothers

    Brothers
    Subtle and brilliantly acted. Liked it a lot more than I expected to. (****)

  • : Whiplash

    Whiplash
    An OK movie elevated above the norm by two excellent performances. (***)

  • : Timecrimes

    Timecrimes
    Great bit of timey-wimey nonsense. Liked it a lot. (****)

  • : More Than Honey

    More Than Honey
    Interesting documentary about bees. Didn't blow me away but kept me watching. (***)

  • : Happy-Go-Lucky

    Happy-Go-Lucky
    I thought this was going to irritate me but I ended up being quite charmed by it. (****)

  • : Our Day Will Come

    Our Day Will Come
    Bonkers road movie in which Vincent Cassel goes off on one in revenge for discrimination against redheads. Or something. (**)

  • : La Strada

    La Strada
    Supposedly Fellini's first masterpiece but it was painted with too broad brushstrokes to work its charm on me. The off-putting dubbed dialogue and sound effects didn't help either. (**)

  • : Birdman

    Birdman
    Inspired, ambitious, bonkers. (****)

  • : Inglourious Basterds

    Inglourious Basterds
    Only just got round to watching this. It is ridiculous but lots of fun. Also, an amazing about of subtitled dialogue for a major American film. (****)

  • : Le Mepris

    Le Mepris
    Brigitte Bardot, Jack Palance, Michel Piccoli and Fritz Lang star in a beautifully shot but terribly pretentious movie. Palance is awful throughout. (**)

Statcounter