I can't remember the last time I gave up on a book I was reading for pleasure.
I give up on books I have been sent to review, and submissions I receive as a publisher, all the time. It's par for the course. Too much too read, only so many hours in the day.
But when I have selected something for myself, non-work related, purely for fun, then I tend to have an excellent strike rate. I am a splendid judge of my own tastes, even if I do say so myself.
And this book had everything going for it. Classic spy novel. In print for nearly 40 years. Acclaimed TV adaptation with Alec Guinness that has achieved legendary status. New film version that people seem intent on lobbing award nominations towards. An author of genre fiction who has been accepted by the literari. The lot.
It seemed like a banker.
So why was it so dreadfully, dreadfully dull?
When I tell you that I fell asleep while reading it, I am not doing so for comic effect. I really did doze off mid-paragraph. This was in the middle of the afternoon.
But enough amusing tittle-tattle. I should try to be constructive. What made me stop reading after 104 pages?
Well, the opening is really rather clunky. A prologue, of sorts, set in a boarding school. I realise that it sets up something that comes in later on but that didn't stop it being a distraction that starts things off on the wrong foot.
Once that is out of the way things picked up a bit. The portrait of George Smiley, retired intelligence officer, is bleak and sad. Whole pages of miserable greyness that actually worked quite well.
But then the spying stuff started and I just got bored with the whole thing. It is unnecessarily complicated and irritatingly slow. Le Carre jumps from character to character with little explanation and nowhere near enough context for you to work out who they actually are. Perhaps this would have all become clearer the more I read on but, as you know, I was asleep by then.
I realise the book is supposed to give us a glimpse of the secret world of spies, and that we aren't meant to know what everything means, but I got fed up with references to the 'Circus', 'housekeepers', 'lamplighters' and so on. I could have put up with them if the surrounding story was sufficiently compelling, but it wasn't. Whole passages went past without an ounce of comprehension on my part.
Try this for size:
He held her hand, waiting. Lapin, the rabbit, she said, clerk driver at the Embassy, twerp. At first she couldn't work him out. She suspected him of being one Ivlov alias Broad but she couldn't prove it and no one would help her anyway. Lapin the rabbit spent most of his day padding round London looking at girls and not daring to talk to them. But gradually she began to pick up the connection. Polyakov gave a reception, Lapin helped pour the drinks. Polyakov was called in late at night, and half an hour later Lapin turned up presumably to unbutton a telegram. And when Polyakov flew to Moscow Lapin the rabbit actually moved into the embassy and slept there till he came back: 'He was doubling up,' said Connie firmly. 'Stuck out a mile.'
Any ideas? I haven't a fucking clue.
At first I thought it was just me. I am a bit thick and not cut out for spy novels. But when I mentioned on Twitter that I was giving up a whole host of people responded with sympathy and agreement. One person had just re-read it and couldn't work out why she had liked it first time round. Another had recently given up on it as well, a few dozen pages further in than me. Someone else hoped that the boarding school opening would be left out of the movie. A few others clearly shared my view. No one defended it, but I am sure there are millions who would. They just don't follow me on Twitter. The misguided fools.
Of course, the whole point to reading Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy
now is in preparation for the movie. It is directed by Tomas Alfredson who was the man behind Let The Right One In, one of my favourite films of recent years, and the reviews have been very positive indeed.
Here's hoping that this is one movie that is better than the book. A lot better.